From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkMHD-0001mc-Ma
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:02:11 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GkMHB-0001ku-GJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:02:10 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkMHB-0001kj-27
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:02:09 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.4] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GkMHA-0004xu-K7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:02:08 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] Recursion in cpu_physical_memory_rw
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:02:02 +0000
References: <20061115025839.GA22608@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<C1807884.456C%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
	<20061115111226.GA26208@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20061115111226.GA26208@gondor.apana.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200611151502.03885.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

> However, chips such as rtl8139 should never
> do MMIO in this case (the real hardware would never allow that to occur)

Really? Why wouldn't it work on real hardware?

Paul

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Recursion in cpu_physical_memory_rw
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:02:02 +0000
Message-ID: <200611151502.03885.paul@codesourcery.com>
References: <20061115025839.GA22608@gondor.apana.org.au>
	<C1807884.456C%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
	<20061115111226.GA26208@gondor.apana.org.au>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061115111226.GA26208@gondor.apana.org.au>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Xen Development Mailing List <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> However, chips such as rtl8139 should never
> do MMIO in this case (the real hardware would never allow that to occur)

Really? Why wouldn't it work on real hardware?

Paul