From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030674AbWKOQbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:31:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030670AbWKOQbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:31:12 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:59789 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030666AbWKOQbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:31:11 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: patches@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [patches] [PATCH] x86-64: adjust pmd_bad() Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:31:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: "Jan Beulich" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <455B3AF2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> In-Reply-To: <455B3AF2.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611151731.06074.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 15 November 2006 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote: > Make pmd_bad() symmetrical to pgd_bad() and pud_bad(). At once, > simplify them all. Got them all, thanks. Including the two i386 patches on l-k. I didn't include the ACPI warning patch -- that should go via Len Brown's tree. Perhaps you resend it to him/linux-acpi to make sure he gets it. -Andi