All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Kimdon <david.kimdon@devicescape.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: David Kimdon <david.kimdon@devicescape.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Simon Barber <simon@devicescape.com>,
	Jouni Malinen <jkm@devicescape.com>,
	Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>,
	Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
	Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>,
	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:55:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061119165521.GB25557@devicescape.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1163954089.15473.16.camel@johannes.berg>

On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 05:34:49PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 07:56 -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> 
> > What is wrong with the driver setting the function pointer to NULL for
> > the cards that do not support scanning?  Where does this requirment
> > come from that the function pointers in struct ieee80211_wiphy be
> > identical for all cards?
> 
> Well I want to allow drivers to make assign the 33 function pointers in
> a static structure, and differences between cards must then be handled
> in the non-static part.

ok.  I am concerned that making this split between per driver and per
card is difficult to get right.  Setting or not setting a function
pointer for an operation is fairly standard practice and I don't see
the value in introducing yet another way to indicate support.

-David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-19 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-17 22:27 [PATCH 0/10] d80211: move away from wmaster towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-17 22:50 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove useless driver name field Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:32   ` Jouni Malinen
2006-11-20 18:40     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 22:21       ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-11-20 22:33         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:44     ` Michael Wu
2006-11-17 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/10] d80211: move away from wmaster towards wiphy Pavel Roskin
2006-11-18  0:16 ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-18 23:53 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove IEEE80211_CONF_SW_{EN,DE}CRYPT Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:16   ` Michael Buesch
2006-11-19  0:04 ` [PATCH] d80211: remove calib_int Johannes Berg
2006-11-19  0:21 ` [PATCH] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 15:56   ` David Kimdon
2006-11-19 16:34     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:50       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:55       ` David Kimdon [this message]
2006-11-19 16:57         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 17:25           ` David Kimdon
2006-11-19 17:54             ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 16:15   ` Michael Buesch
2006-11-19 16:35     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:18 ` [PATCH 0/13] move d80211 away from netdev towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:22   ` [PATCH 1/13] d80211: clean up some stupid list and loop code Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 11:01     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 11:58       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:55         ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:23   ` [PATCH 2/13] d80211: reduce mdev usage Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:23   ` [PATCH 3/13] " Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:26   ` [PATCH 4/13] d80211: reduce mdev usage, change ieee80211_rx_mgmt Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 12:08     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 12:25       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:27   ` [PATCH 5/13] d80211: reduce master ieee80211_ptr deref in scan routines Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:28   ` [PATCH 6/13] d80211: change the identifier netdev to ieee80211_hw Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 17:57     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-20 18:04       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:52       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 22:45     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-21 17:48       ` [PATCH] d80211: use ieee80211_hw.dev Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:29   ` [PATCH 7/13] d80211: add a perm_addr hardware property Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 23:20     ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 18:54       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:29   ` [PATCH 8/13] d80211: introduce IEEE80211_HW_FRAG flag Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:30   ` [PATCH 9/13] d80211: remove useless driver name field Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:31   ` [PATCH 10/13] bcm43xx: update to new d80211 driver API Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:43     ` Michael Buesch
2006-11-19 19:52       ` Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:31   ` [PATCH 11/13] d80211: remove IEEE80211_CONF_SW_{EN,DE}CRYPT Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:32   ` [PATCH 12/13] d80211: remove calib_int Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 19:33   ` [PATCH 13/13] d80211: fix scan issues with new ops Johannes Berg
2006-11-19 23:32   ` [PATCH 0/13] move d80211 away from netdev towards wiphy Johannes Berg
2006-11-20 19:14     ` Jiri Benc
2006-11-22 19:18       ` [RFC 0/3] more power to cfg80211 Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:22         ` [RFC 1/3] cfg80211: handle wiphy, use wiphy in netdev, do wiphy sysfs Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:24         ` [RFC 2/3] d80211: use new wiphy stuff from cfg80211 Johannes Berg
2006-11-22 19:25         ` [RFC 3/3] bcm43xx: API update Johannes Berg
2006-12-11 13:03         ` [RFC 0/3] more power to cfg80211 Jiri Benc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061119165521.GB25557@devicescape.com \
    --to=david.kimdon@devicescape.com \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=hong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=simon@devicescape.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.