From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Ezust Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]: conntrack: fix refcount leak when findingexpectation Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:32:15 -0800 Message-ID: <200611271132.21563.alan.ezust@presinet.com> References: <200611232315.kANNFVi3006773@toshiba.co.jp> <456B214A.5090207@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1290757.CbPSEiulQ7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <456B214A.5090207@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --nextPart1290757.CbPSEiulQ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I noticed many messages indicating that things are being applied to conntra= ck=20 and their related libs - but whenever I check my own checked out copy from= =20 svn (rev 6698), it does not show me anything new to update, and it appears = as=20 if nobody is committing to that particular part of the repo. Are you=20 committing these changes to a branch other than trunk? On Monday 27 November 2006 09:32, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Yasuyuki KOZAKAI wrote: > > # Sorry, I forgot netfilter-devel, so resend. > > > > All users of __{ip,nf}_conntrack_expect_find() don't expect that > > it increments the reference count of expectation. > > Applied, thanks. =2D-=20 Alan Ezust www.presinet.com Presinet, inc alan.ezust@presinet.com Victoria, BC, Canada --nextPart1290757.CbPSEiulQ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFaz1FsJbtw6GURksRAmOMAJ4ymyenYdkAvr073LqzuFM0KS07PACfQhoU Al24Xq5q4SR1EK+x68/LQ8w= =9UZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1290757.CbPSEiulQ7--