From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758593AbWK0XOJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:14:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758594AbWK0XOI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:14:08 -0500 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:43525 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758593AbWK0XOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:14:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:14:09 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Linux kernel mailing list , trivial@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: Remove obsolete CONFIG_DMA_IS_DMA32 entries from ia64 config files Message-ID: <20061127231409.GQ15364@stusta.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 04:37:35PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Remove the obsolete CONFIG_DMA_IS_DMA32 entries from the various > "defconfig" files under arch/ia64. >... I do not like this manual editing of defconfigs: - obsolete options in defconfigs don't cause any harm - the next time someone refreshes the defconfigs they will automatically go away - if it became common to manually patch defconfigs, we'd soon get many patch conflicts cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed