From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1GqYT5-00024X-Qy for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:16:03 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqYT4-00023Y-1L for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:16:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqYT2-00023A-Tg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:16:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqYT2-000232-Oo for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:16:00 -0500 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GqYT2-0007l7-GL for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 12:16:00 -0500 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130313CD0B83A for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:08:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11043CD0B839 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 21:08:42 +0100 (CET) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:15:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <1164913211.4067.46.camel@diesel> <87k61c3e94.fsf@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <87k61c3e94.fsf@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612021815.52993.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000359, version=0.17.2 Subject: Re: grub2 accessibility: beeps X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:16:02 -0000 On Thursday 30 November 2006 20:50, Marco Gerards wrote: > Perhaps, I was thinking about something like: > > menuentry "foo" --beep=pitch,duration > > In that case it looks like a command. I don't like this, either. My preference is to use a style sheet. How the menu interface appears should be defined by a style sheet instead of commands. I wanted to implement such support, but I haven't done yet. Okuji