From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Subject: Re: sata_sis and SIS180 in combined mode Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 12:56:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20061204125637.539c102d@localhost.localdomain> References: <200612031834.16797.sven@linux4geeks.de> <45735B51.5040501@gmx.net> <20061204001114.066b10f3@localhost.localdomain> <457370CB.60008@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:3533 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936351AbWLDMuz (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2006 07:50:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <457370CB.60008@gmx.net> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Uwe Koziolek Cc: Sven Ladegast , uwe.koziolek@web.de, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 01:50:19 +0100 Uwe Koziolek wrote: > One port is PATA, the other port is SATA, they have the same PCI > resources. It is possible to configure > the controller to use both ports in SATA mode without slave. Then the > PATA part of the controller is not > reachable. Ok so if the pata_sis driver exports sis_info133 (UDMA 133 port_info structure) is that sufficient for you to attach the PATA port to the PATA methods for this chipset ? Alan