From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gsiiv-0004xD-EP for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:37:21 -0800 Received: from [198.99.130.12] (helo=saraswathi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Gsiit-0008VO-VI for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:37:21 -0800 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:33:04 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Message-ID: <20061208163304.GA5944@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] UML and fastcall/FASTCALL List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Adrian Bunk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop. If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either. The only reason there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760768AbWLHQjj (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760771AbWLHQji (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:38 -0500 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:39076 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760768AbWLHQji (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:39:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:33:04 -0500 From: Jeff Dike To: Adrian Bunk Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL Message-ID: <20061208163304.GA5944@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061208125928.GA25427@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop. If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either. The only reason there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com