From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, <gregkh@suse.com>,
<linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race in sysfs between sysfs_remove_file() and read()/write() #2
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 16:13:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061211104306.GA22628@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0612041101410.3606-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:06:41AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Maneesh Soni wrote:
>
> > hmm, I guess Greg has to say the final word. The question is either to fail
> > the IO (-ENODEV) or fail the file removal (-EBUSY). If we are not going to
> > fail the removal then your patch is the way to go.
> >
> > Greg?
>
> Oliver is right that we cannot allow device_remove_file() to fail. In
> fact we can't even allow it to block until all the existing open file
> references are closed.
>
> Our major questions have to do with the details of the patch itself. In
> particular, we are worried about possible races with the VFS and the
> handling of the inode's usage count. Can you examine the patch carefully
> to see if it is okay?
>
Sorry for late reply.. I reviewed the patch and it looks ok me.
Thanks
Maneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-11 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-01 22:43 race in sysfs between sysfs_remove_file() and read()/write() #2 Oliver Neukum
2006-12-04 4:43 ` Maneesh Soni
2006-12-04 6:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-04 13:04 ` Maneesh Soni
2006-12-04 13:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-04 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2006-12-04 16:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-04 16:57 ` Alan Stern
2006-12-04 17:34 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-11 10:43 ` Maneesh Soni [this message]
2006-12-11 23:05 ` Greg KH
2006-12-04 18:47 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061211104306.GA22628@in.ibm.com \
--to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.