From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken SCSI_SEAGATE driver
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:09:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061213000902.GD28443@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165966274.5903.56.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:31:14PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 17:22 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The SCSI_SEAGATE driver has:
> > - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and
> > - is still marked as BROKEN.
> >
> > Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be
> > unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future.
> >
> > But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still
> > present in the older kernel releases.
>
> Would you care to explain the rationale for this, please. If the driver
> had been riddled with errors and compilation problems, I might have
> acquiesced, but now I come to look it over, it seems structurally
> reasonably OK (we certainly have non-BROKEN worse ones) plus it compiles
> fine. So I'm wondering why it's marked broken in the first place.
>
> Since it was your original patch:
>
> Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
> Date: Mon Sep 1 19:22:52 2003 -0700
>
> [PATCH] Mark more drivers BROKEN{,ON_SMP}
>
> - let more drivers that don't compile depend on BROKEN
> - MTD_BLKMTD is fixed, remove the dependency on BROKEN
> - let all drivers that don't compile on SMP (due to cli/sti usage)
> depend on a BROKEN_ON_SMP that is only defined if !SMP || BROKEN
> - #include interrupt.h for dummy cli/sti/... in two files to fix the
> UP compilation of these files
>
> I marked only drivers that are broken for a long time and where I don't
> know about existing fixes with BROKEN or BROKEN_ON_SMP.
>
> I'd like to know why it was marked BROKEN in the first place.
There must have been a compile error that has since been fixed, but I
don't remember the details of this specific driver and I don't have
such old compile logs anymore.
> Thanks,
>
> James
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-13 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 16:22 [2.6 patch] remove the broken SCSI_SEAGATE driver Adrian Bunk
2006-12-12 23:31 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-13 0:09 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-15 13:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-15 14:05 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-12-15 16:00 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-17 20:03 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-17 20:22 ` James Bottomley
2006-12-17 21:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-18 8:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-12-18 13:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-12-18 15:20 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061213000902.GD28443@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.