All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] scrub non-__GLIBC__ checks in linux/socket.h and linux/stat.h
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:57:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061216185726.GA17496@codepoet.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0612161042g3b61d42csd54cae46e4864f30@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat Dec 16, 2006 at 01:42:11PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >but there are a few other
> >cases which still contain compound preprocessor directives such as:
> >
> >  #if defined(__KERNEL__) || !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ < 2)
> >
> >having never worked with unifdef before, i guess i was being overly
> >optimistic in thinking that it, if i "unifdef"ed __KERNEL__, it might
> >at least simplify the expression.  oh, well ... live and learn.
> 
> userspace should be worrying about userspace, so having the socket.h
> and stat.h pollute the namespace in the non-glibc case is wrong and
> pretty much prevents any other libc from utilizing these headers
> sanely unless they set up the __GLIBC__ define themselves (which
> sucks)
> -mike

Ack from me.  I'd love to see this applied so uClibc could
stop have to define __GLIBC__

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-16 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-16 18:42 [patch] scrub non-__GLIBC__ checks in linux/socket.h and linux/stat.h Mike Frysinger
2006-12-16 18:57 ` Erik Andersen [this message]
2007-01-25  6:30   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061216185726.GA17496@codepoet.org \
    --to=andersen@codepoet.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.