From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] git-svn: rename 'commit' command to 'set-tree' Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:44:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20061216214455.GC26800@hand.yhbt.net> References: <11662558902535-git-send-email-normalperson@yhbt.net> <7vbqm4ezv8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 21:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vbqm4ezv8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GvhL6-0000Jn-40 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:45:04 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753820AbWLPVo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:44:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753821AbWLPVo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:44:59 -0500 Received: from hand.yhbt.net ([66.150.188.102]:59175 "EHLO hand.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753820AbWLPVo6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:44:58 -0500 Received: by hand.yhbt.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id E62542DC034; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:44:56 -0800 (PST) To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > Eric Wong writes: > > > 'set-tree' probably accurately describes what the command > > formerly known as 'commit' does. > > > > I'm not entirely sure that 'dcommit' should be renamed to 'commit' > > just yet... Perhaps 'push' or 'push-changes'? > > I think Pasky did such a three-way rename to avoid breaking > people's fingers. I thought it was a reasonable transition > strategy, but some people might say its only effect was to break > people's fingers not just once but twice, so Pasky himself > and/or Cogito users may have some input on this. Good point about breaking fingers twice. I don't think 'commit' accurately describes any current operation that git-svn does; so the command can probably go away safely. I'm guessing that something along the lines of 'push' is probably a better way to describe 'dcommit'. > We are talking about major UI change between 1.4 series and > v1.5.0 on the core Porcelain-ish side, so if you feel confident > that things would settle down in a month or so in the git-svn > front, it may be a good idea to roll sweeping changes into the > same timeframe. I plan on supporting remotes in the config file; and adding support for svn in git-fetch (wrapping git-svn multi-fetch, which should get faster by then) --