From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: zippel@linux-m68k.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:31:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061218193111.GH10316@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612181341090.28308@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 01:46:27PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 11:41:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > Remove the note in the documentation that suggests people can use
> > > "requires" for dependencies in Kconfig files.
> > >...
> >
> > Considering that noone uses it, what about the patch below to also
> > remove the implementation?
>
> ... big snip ...
>
> i have no problem knocking out of the parser anything related to
> "depends" or "requires." in fact, i did note in earlier patch
> submissions that i was just cleaning the Kconfig files but i was
> leaving the parser alone, and someone else was welcome to take care of
> that.
>
> if the kbuild folks are good with this, i certainly have no objection.
>
> rday
>
> p.s. i didn't look closely enough to see if your patch took out
> support for both "depends" *and* "requires". at this point, neither
> of those are necessary anymore -- it's all "depends on" except for
> three remaining Kconfig files.
It takes out only "requires" (as the patch description says).
Whether to remove the plain "depends" (opposed to "depends on") is a
different (and perhaps more controversial) question, but it should
anyway not happen before the last usage is removed.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-18 16:41 [PATCH] Remove suggestion that Kconfig files can use "requires" to list deps Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 18:04 ` [2.6 patch] kconfig: remove the unused "requires" syntax Adrian Bunk
2006-12-18 18:46 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-18 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-12-18 19:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-19 17:53 ` Roman Zippel
2006-12-28 21:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-01 19:08 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061218193111.GH10316@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.