From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] two missing bits (was Re: Add
	-Wcast-qual flag)
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:55:39 +0100
Message-ID: <200612221055.39865.Christoph.Egger@amd.com>
References: <458BB3E5.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
	<C1B15874.628F%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
	<458BB8BD.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <458BB8BD.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Friday 22 December 2006 10:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
> If this was with -Wconst-qual, yes. But didn't we agree that at least for
> now we'll not add that warning (and hence we also don't absolutely have to
> change code only affected by it)? Jan

So far I understood, we agreed to not add the flag and not to add
the __UNCONST() hack.