From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:12:49 -0600
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: Fix spin lock already unlocked bug
In-Reply-To: <459A69A0.5070003@redhat.com>
References: <459A69A0.5070003@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20070102151249.GA13513@redhat.com>
List-Id: <cluster-devel.redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:18:08PM +0000, Patrick Caulfield wrote:

> >From the "how the hell did that get in there" collection.
> 
> I just noticed this message when testing some other changes I'd made to
> lowcomms (to use workqueues) but the problem seems to be in the current
> git trees too. I'm amazed no-one has seen it.
> 
>    BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#1, dlm_recoverd/16868
> 
> Please check this before committing it someone (everyone?), in case I'm
> hallucinating after all the christmas punch ;-)

Looks good to me (haven't seen it since my test machines are UP).  The
spin_locks are in the RHEL5 code, I'm not sure how they disappeared
upstream.