From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christoph Egger" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkelf32: Correct sh_link Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:14:54 +0100 Message-ID: <200701031614.54922.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> References: <200701031611.13006.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701031611.13006.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wednesday 03 January 2007 16:11, Christoph Egger wrote: > On Wednesday 03 January 2007 14:57, Keir Fraser wrote: > > SHT_PROGBITS sections do not use the sh_link field. It's used by > > symbol-table sections, relocation-entry sections, and suchlike, of which > > we don't have any. And .shstrtab section is never linked to. > > Why do you strip the symbol table and re-add it in an unusual format > when linking the bootable ELF image? Is this a historical relict? Ah, sorry! I actually meant: Why do you strip the symbol and string tables and re-add the string table in an unusal format? Is this a historical relict? Christoph