From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: a@gaydenko.com (Andrew Gaydenko) Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:54:52 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] W83627DHG, steps to use Message-Id: <200701040654.52884@goldspace.net> List-Id: References: <200612271943.00165@goldspace.net> In-Reply-To: <200612271943.00165@goldspace.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org ==== On Thursday 04 January 2007 06:34, you wrote: ===... >coretemp is measured at the hottest part of the core, while >motherboard will tend to measure the surface temperature. A few >degrees difference is expected. Also that's a really nice temperature >for coretemp, perhaps you have really frigid air conditioning. My >overclocked Core2Duo (@3.4 GHz) runs coretemps of 51C idle and up to >60C under full load... which is a huge improvement from my old Athlon >MPs which were 56-65C surface temperature. [OT] My aim is a silence rather an overclocking ;-) So I have set Zalaman 9500 to ~1550 rpm (all fans noise are below Samsung HDD noise now). [T] OK, I can conclude, coretemp's temps are more "honest", as expected - closer to cores - closer to truth. >I made a patch for KSensors, I don't use SysGuard. It seems like KSensors project is not under development now :-( At any case I'll try it with your patch, thanks!