From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9mi_Denis-Courmont?= Subject: Re: Conntrack and IPv6 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:23:51 +0100 Message-ID: <200701041523.51386@auguste.remlab.net> References: <200701041452.25119.victor.stinner@inl.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Victor Stinner In-Reply-To: <200701041452.25119.victor.stinner@inl.fr> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Le jeudi 4 janvier 2007 14:52, Victor Stinner a =E9crit : > Do I need a kernel newer than 2.6.17? Or netfilter conntrack doesn't > support IPv6? It does if you use CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK (nf_conntrack module) and=20 CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_IPV6 (nf_conntrack_ipv6); it does NOT if you use=20 CONFIG_IP_NF_CONNTRACK (IPv4-only). Stock kernels use the latter=20 because they need IPv4 NAT support which is not provided by=20 nf_conntrack before kernel version 2.6.20. Regards, =2D-=20 R=E9mi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/