From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2dTX-0000Ms-VP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:02:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2dTU-0000KA-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:02:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2dTT-0000Jx-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:02:23 -0500 Received: from [193.7.176.60] (helo=mail.bawue.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H2dTT-0006SI-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 20:02:23 -0500 Received: from lagash (88-106-179-150.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.106.179.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1F6B9EDE for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 02:02:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from ths by lagash with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2dUH-0004T3-5D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:03:13 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 01:03:13 +0000 From: Thiemo Seufer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu Makefile configure Message-ID: <20070105010313.GA14085@networkno.de> References: <20070103135950.GB5849@networkno.de> <459BCF30.5010200@bellard.org> <20070103161653.GF5849@networkno.de> <20070104122656.GA708@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070104122656.GA708@networkno.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > Fabrice Bellard wrote: > > > IMHO, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS overriding should not be allowed for QEMU as it > > > is almost sure to break the dyngen stuff. If ever it is allowed, it > > > should be done so that the CFLAGS for the files used by dyngen are not > > > modified. > > > > That's why I made OP_CFLAGS a separate set of flags. > > > > I append the next version of the patch, which incorporates the > > suggestions made by Daniel and Bernhard, and fixes a gcc3 detection > > bug I introduced earlier. > > Next iteration, this uses BASE_CFLAGS and BASE_LDFLAGS instead of > gmake's override feature. Comitted, since it held up well for several people. Thiemo