All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Eric Moore <eric.moore@lsil.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:10:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070106161017.GI24620@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168097445.2792.53.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:30:45AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:46 -0700, Eric Moore wrote:
> > -			if (scsi_status == MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY)
> > +			if (ioc->bus_type != SPI && scsi_status == MPI_SCSI_STATUS_BUSY)
> >  				sc->result = (DID_BUS_BUSY << 16) | scsi_status;
> >  			else
> >  				sc->result = (DID_OK << 16) | scsi_status;
> 
> DID_BUS_BUSY causes an immediate retry, but it does debit the retry
> count, so it shouldn't cause "infinite retries" ... if it does, there's
> something else wrong here.

I wonder if this is the same bug I'm chasing (on ia64 machines,
reproduced with both Montecito and Madison).  

The symptom is a stack overflow caused by this infinite loop:

generic_unplug_device
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [1]
  blk_requeue_request
  elv_requeue_request
  __elv_add_request
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [2]
  blk_requeue_request
  elv_requeue_request
  __elv_add_request
__generic_unplug_device
  scsi_request_fn [3]
  scsi_dispatch_cmd
  scsi_queue_insert
  blk_insert_request
  scsi_request_fn [4]
  blk_plug_device

(stack dump courtesy of incrementing a counter each time through
__generic_unplug_device and checking it in blk_plug_device() and
__generic_unplug_device)

I don't see how it happens; as far as I can tell, by the time we're
going to call blk_plug_device() in scsi_request_fn [4], there's no way
to unplug the queue again before it gets back to scsi_request_fn [3]
... and from the point where we call scsi_dispatch_cmd(), we immediately
either break or test blk_queue_plugged() and exit.  There should be no
way for it to call blk_requeue_request() again.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-06 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-05  3:46 [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries Eric Moore
2007-01-06 15:30 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-06 16:10   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2007-01-06 16:28     ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-08 22:03 Moore, Eric
2007-01-08 22:24 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-09  1:37 Moore, Eric
2007-01-09 16:17 ` Michael Reed
2007-01-09 17:49   ` Manon Goo
2007-01-09 18:14 Adam Zimman
2007-01-09 20:55 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-01-09 21:32   ` Edward Goggin
2007-01-10 16:10     ` James Bottomley
2007-01-10 16:44       ` Edward Goggin
2007-01-10  5:44 Moore, Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070106161017.GI24620@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=eric.moore@lsil.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.