All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9}
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 14:26:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070107142641.GA30379@deepthought> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070106140459.a6b72039.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 02:04:59PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 19:34:59 +0000 Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:42:32PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > You might remove and re-insert the DIMMS.
> > > Sometimes there are poor contacts if the DIMMS are not fully seated and clicked in.
> > > 
> > > The real mystery is the 32 vs 64-bit thing.
> > > Are the devices configured the same way -- ie are they both in IOAPIC mode
> > > and /proc/interrupts looks the same for both modes?
> > > 
> > > -Len
> > 
> >  Too late, I've started memtest-86+.  If it seems ok after an
> > overnight run, I'll take a look at /proc/interrupts.  How can I tell
> > it is in IOAPIC mode, please ?  Google was not helpful for this, but
> > if it's an override, the only things on my command lines are root=
> > and video= settings.
> 
> (did anyone ever answer this?)
> 
> In IO-APIC mode, /proc/interrupts contains entries like these:
> 
>            CPU0       CPU1       
>   0:  121218123          0    IO-APIC-edge  timer
>   1:     715259          0    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
>   6:          5          0    IO-APIC-edge  floppy
>   7:          0          0    IO-APIC-edge  parport0
>   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
>  12:   10011272          0    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
>  14:   11561548          0    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
>  66:    4525183          0         PCI-MSI  libata
>  74:       1711          0   IO-APIC-level  ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb6
>  82:          4          0   IO-APIC-level  ohci_hcd:usb2, ohci_hcd:usb3, ohci_hcd:usb4, ohci_hcd:usb5
>  98:     101326          0         PCI-MSI  HDA Intel
> 106:   17747181          0         PCI-MSI  eth0
> 169:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb9
> 177:          3          0   IO-APIC-level  ohci1394
> 185:         15          0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb8, aic79xx
> 193:     427962          0   IO-APIC-level  uhci_hcd:usb7, aic79xx
> 
> If not in IO-APIC mode, lots of those will say "XT-PIC" instead
> of IO-APIC.
> 
> >  Certainly, it seems likely that the configs could be fairly
> > different in their detail.
> 
> 
 I eventually found it ("Local APIC support on uniprocessors") in
menuconfig.  In the meantime, I'd moved my 32-bit activity to a
different box (also athlon64, but a bit faster) and I had one oops
on that.  At least, I assume it was an oops - the caps and scroll
LEDs flashed, but I couldn't do anything with MagicSysrq, not even
force a reboot.  Ran diff on the various configs, changed to IO-APIC
plus an unrelated change to use libata for the cdrom.  The faster box
_seems_ stable (used for a couple of hours, and then for a whole day)
so I'm back on the original problem machine.

 Last night I reconfigured the kernel (select X86_UP_APIC, deselect
ACPI_VIDEO [ had been a module ], select ACPI_DEBUG, select PCI_MSI
(had been on in my 64-bit configs), removed some ATA/ATAPI drivers I
didn't need).  I was running on the 'old' 2.6.19.1 while I built it,
and again got the flashing LEDs after the build, but nothing logged
although I was able to force a reboot with SysRq b.

 I guess that when it does have problems, it is mostly within 30
minutes of booting - otherwise, it can be up all day.  So, for the
moment I'm hopeful that changing the config will help, but it will
be several days before I feel at all confident.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-07 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-01 16:01 x86 instability with 2.6.1{8,9} Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 16:48 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-01 17:07   ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 19:13     ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-01 19:45       ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-02 17:25 ` Len Brown
2007-01-02 18:04   ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-02 18:42     ` Len Brown
2007-01-02 19:34       ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-06 22:04         ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 14:26           ` Ken Moffat [this message]
2007-01-15 16:29             ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-25 23:56               ` Ken Moffat
2007-01-31 21:36                 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-01-31 23:26                   ` Ken Moffat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070107142641.GA30379@deepthought \
    --to=zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.