From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:47:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] ruminations on kernel.h Message-Id: <20070107204729.GQ24620@parisc-linux.org> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 03:24:41PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > the various utility macros (ARRAY_SIZE, FIELD_SIZE, min/max, > container_of, etc.) might fit better into a file called macros.h or > util.h. > > then there's all the debugging/logging stuff -- the priority macros, > loglevel stuff, pr_debug, pr_info, etc. why not a new file called > "debug.h"? > > anyway, you get the idea. there doesn't seem to be much rhyme or > reason for what has been tossed into kernel.h. Well, kernel.h really is misc.h or util.h ;-) _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors