Re: [PATCHSET 1][PATCH 0/6] Filesystem AIO read/write

[Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 05:08:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:14:19 +0530
> Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:02:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:26:21 +0530
> > > Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 02:15:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > Patches against next -mm would be appreciated, please.  Sorry about that.
> >
> > I have updated the patchset against 2620-rc3-mm1, incorporated various
> > cleanups suggested during last review. Please let me know if I have missed
> > anything:
> 
> The s/lock_page_slow/lock_page_blocking/ got lost.  I redid it.

I thought the lock_page_blocking was an alternative you had suggested
to the __lock_page vs lock_page_async discussion which got resolved later.
That is why I didn't make the change in this patchset.
The call does not block in the async case, hence the choice of
the _slow suffix (like in fs/buffer.c). But if lock_page_blocking()
sounds more intuitive to you, that's OK. 

> 
> For the record, patches-via-http are very painful.  Please always always
> email them.
> 
> As a result, these patches ended up with titles which are derived from their
> filenames, which are cryptic.

Sorry about that - I wanted to ask if you'd prefer my resending them to the
list, but missed doing so. Some people have found it easier to download the
series as a whole when they intend to apply it, so I ended up maintaining it
that way all this while.

Regards
Suparna

-- 
Suparna Bhattacharya (suparna@in.ibm.com)
Linux Technology Center
IBM Software Lab, India