All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19)
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:49:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070112184945.GC24291@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18xg8dua9.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:33:34AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > And I get:
> >
> > [ 1013.864201] PAGE ffff810001000000 (pfn=0): flags=0, count=0
> >
> > So at least no one is using that page. Still it is not clear why it
> > doesn't have the reserve flag turned on.
> 
> My hunch is that it might have something to do with the difference
> in the e820 map.  The original map reports that whole page as
> being usable while in the kexec case the memory from 0x100 is
> reported as being usable.  Perhaps someone has a rounding error?

I added this right at the beginning of sanitize_e820_map():

	for (i=0; i < *pnr_map; i++) {
		printk("index %d: addr=%llx, size=%llx, type=%d\n",
		       i, 
		       (unsigned long long)biosmap[i].addr, 
		       (unsigned long long)biosmap[i].size, 
		       (unsigned int)biosmap[i].type);
	}

.. and got (kexec boot):

[    0.000000] index 0: addr=100, size=9b700, type=1
[    0.000000] index 1: addr=9b800, size=4800, type=2
[    0.000000] index 2: addr=100000, size=cfe70000, type=1
[    0.000000] index 3: addr=cff70000, size=8000, type=3
[    0.000000] index 4: addr=cff78000, size=8000, type=4
[    0.000000] index 5: addr=cff80000, size=80000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 6: addr=e0000000, size=10000000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 7: addr=fec00000, size=10000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 8: addr=fee00000, size=1000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 9: addr=ff800000, size=400000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 10: addr=fffffc00, size=400, type=2
[    0.000000] index 11: addr=100000000, size=30000000, type=1

Compared with a normal boot:

[    0.000000] index 0: addr=0, size=9b800, type=1
[    0.000000] index 1: addr=9b800, size=4800, type=2
[    0.000000] index 2: addr=e4000, size=1c000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 3: addr=100000, size=cfe70000, type=1
[    0.000000] index 4: addr=cff70000, size=8000, type=3
[    0.000000] index 5: addr=cff78000, size=8000, type=4
[    0.000000] index 6: addr=cff80000, size=80000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 7: addr=e0000000, size=10000000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 8: addr=fec00000, size=10000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 9: addr=fee00000, size=1000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 10: addr=ff800000, size=400000, type=2
[    0.000000] index 11: addr=fffffc00, size=400, type=2
[    0.000000] index 12: addr=100000000, size=30000000, type=1

So that is the actual boot data that is passed to us.

Anyway, if I add this:

	if (*pnr_map >= 1) {
		if (biosmap[0].addr == 0x100)
			biosmap[0].addr = 0;
	}

kexec works. I'll use this for now, but obviously we _must_ come up 
with a cleaner fix...		   

-- 
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il

      reply	other threads:[~2007-01-12 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-12 12:24 kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19 Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 14:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-01-12 14:55   ` Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 14:57   ` Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 15:26     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-01-12 16:02       ` kexec + ACPI in 2.6.19 (was: Re: kexec + USB storage in 2.6.19) Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 16:28         ` Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 16:43           ` Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 16:56             ` Dan Aloni
2007-01-12 17:33               ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-01-12 18:49                 ` Dan Aloni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070112184945.GC24291@localdomain \
    --to=da-x@monatomic.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.