From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Baumann Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitk errors out if launched in a subdirectory Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:10:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20070113161057.GA28354@xp.machine.xx> References: <20070109143019.GA24688@xp.machine.xx> <20070112174340.GA6262@xp.machine.xx> <17832.20086.20532.159295@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Baumann , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 13 17:10:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H5lSU-0005Bk-UK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:10:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422710AbXAMQKF (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:10:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422706AbXAMQKF (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:10:05 -0500 Received: from matlock.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.24.35]:43155 "HELO mail.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1422710AbXAMQKD (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:10:03 -0500 Received: (qmail 7511 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2007 16:10:00 -0000 Received: from p54aaa36b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO localhost) (p.b@hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de@84.170.163.107) by mail.hofmann.stw.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP; 13 Jan 2007 16:10:00 -0000 To: Paul Mackerras Mail-Followup-To: Paul Mackerras , Peter Baumann , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17832.20086.20532.159295@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 02:13:58PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Peter Baumann writes: > > > Is there something obviously wrong with this patch? It is the second > > time I send this (or a slight variant; last time I even removed the > > enviroment checking) and nobody answered. > > > > Please say so if it is NAKed. > > No, it looks fine. It's just that gitk takes a lower priority than > some other things in my life. > > Paul. > Ok. No problem then. I just felt a little bit stupid after posting the this simple fix the second time and nobody carred. -Peter