From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6QYf-0001z0-QD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:03:25 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6QYf-0001ya-A5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:03:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6QYf-0001yS-3v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:03:25 -0500 Received: from [193.7.176.60] (helo=mail.bawue.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H6QYe-00085b-5v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:03:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:02:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [BUG] QEMU x86_64 SSE bug in modf() Message-ID: <20070115120237.GB25395@networkno.de> References: <45AB54D9.9020207@linbox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45AB54D9.9020207@linbox.com> From: Thiemo Seufer Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ludovic Drolez Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Ludovic Drolez wrote: [snip] > Would someone be able to track down this SSE QEMU bug seen only in SLES's > modf() function ? Please test if this patch for qemu changes the behaviour. Thiemo Index: Makefile.target =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/Makefile.target,v retrieving revision 1.136 diff -u -p -r1.136 Makefile.target --- Makefile.target 7 Jan 2007 22:04:40 -0000 1.136 +++ Makefile.target 15 Jan 2007 11:59:15 -0000 @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ OP_CFLAGS = -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-ali ifeq ($(ARCH),i386) HELPER_CFLAGS+=-fomit-frame-pointer -OP_CFLAGS+=-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fomit-frame-pointer +OP_CFLAGS+=-fomit-frame-pointer ifeq ($(HAVE_GCC3_OPTIONS),yes) OP_CFLAGS+= -falign-functions=0 -fno-gcse else