From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [mm PATCH] RCU: various patches
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 00:49:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070115191909.GA32238@in.ibm.com> (raw)
Andrew,
Please include this patchset for some testing in -mm.
This patchset consists of various merge candidates that would
do well to have some testing in -mm. This patchset breaks
out RCU implementation from its APIs to allow multiple
implementations, gives RCU its own softirq and finally
lines up preemptible RCU from -rt tree as a configurable
RCU implementation for mainline. Published earlier and
re-diffed against -mm. One major change since the last time
is that this has a new implementation of preemptible RCU
from Paul which fixes the problem with watchdog NMI.
For details - http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/13/259
They have been tested lightly using combinations of
dbench, kernbench and ltp (both CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU=y and
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=y) on x86_64 and ppc64. Also ran
rcutorture successfully on my x86_64 box with both
RCU implementations.
Thanks
Dipankar
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-15 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-15 19:19 Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2007-01-15 19:21 ` [mm PATCH 1/6] RCU: split classic rcu Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-16 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-01-15 19:22 ` [mm PATCH 2/6] RCU: softirq for RCU Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-16 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-01-15 19:24 ` [mm PATCH 3/6] RCU: Fix barriers Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-16 17:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-01-15 19:28 ` [mm PATCH 4/6] RCU: preemptible RCU Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-24 0:32 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-26 21:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-26 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-24 0:38 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-15 19:30 ` [mm PATCH 5/6] RCU: debug trace for RCU Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-15 19:31 ` [mm PATCH 6/6] RCU: trivial fixes Dipankar Sarma
2007-01-16 17:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070115191909.GA32238@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.