All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:50:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070116175021.GA9778@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45AD0F70.30808@redhat.com>


* Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> > what do you mean by that - which is this same resource?
> 
> From what has been said here before, all futexes are stored in the 
> same list or hash table or whatever it was.  I want to see how that 
> code behaves if many separate processes concurrently use futexes.

futexes are stored in the bucket hash, and these patches do not change 
that. The pi-list that was talked about is per-futex. So there's no 
change to the way futexes are hashed nor should there be any scalability 
impact - besides the micro-impact that was measured in a number of ways 
- AFAICS.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-16 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-09 16:15 [PATCH 2.6.20-rc4 0/4] futexes functionalities and improvements Pierre Peiffer
2007-01-11 17:47 ` Ulrich Drepper
     [not found]   ` <20070111134615.34902742.akpm@osdl.org>
2007-01-12  7:53     ` Pierre Peiffer
2007-01-12  7:58       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-16  8:34         ` Pierre Peiffer
2007-01-16  9:44           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-16 15:14           ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-01-16 15:40             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-16 17:46               ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-01-16 17:50                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-01-17  7:50                   ` Pierre Peiffer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070116175021.GA9778@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre.peiffer@bull.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.