All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] fix emergency reboot: call reboot notifier list if possible
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:03:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070117020343.8622e44d.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070117093917.GA7538@elte.hu>

> On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:39:17 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> 
> * Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:13:19AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > we dont call the reboot notifiers during emergency reboot mainly because 
> > > it could be called from atomic context and reboot notifiers are a 
> > > blocking notifier list. But actually the kernel is often perfectly 
> > > reschedulable in this stage, so we could as well process the 
> > > reboot_notifier_list.
> > 
> > My experience has been that when there has been the need to use this
> > facility, the kernel hasn't been reschedulable. [...]
> 
> this decision is totally automatic - so if your situation happens and 
> the kernel isnt reschedulable, then the notifier chain wont be called 
> and nothing changes from your perspective. Hm, perhaps this should be 
> dependent on CONFIG_PREEMPT, to make sure preempt_count() is reliable?
> 
> but from my perspective this patch fixes a real regression.
> 
> updated patch attached below.
> 

Making it dependent upon CONFIG_PREEMPT seems a bit sucky.  Perhaps pass in
some "you were called from /proc/sysrq-trigger" notification?

Also, there are ways of telling if the kernel has oopsed (oops counter,
oops_in_progress, etc) which should perhaps be tested.

Or just learn to type `reboot -fn' ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-17 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-17  9:13 [patch] fix emergency reboot: call reboot notifier list if possible Ingo Molnar
2007-01-17  9:22 ` Russell King
2007-01-17  9:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-17 10:03     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-17 10:25       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-23 19:57       ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-24 16:30         ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-24 17:49           ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-01-17  9:51 ` [patch] KVM: do VMXOFF upon reboot Ingo Molnar
2007-01-17 10:02   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-21 10:17     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070117020343.8622e44d.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.