All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, aia21@cam.ac.uk, torvalds@osdl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NTFS
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:17:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070118161741.6ac4e423.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701190022540.17626@alpha.polcom.net>

> On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:27:17 +0100 (CET) Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:38:13 +0000 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:35:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>> Cool.  That means ->put_inode is gone in -mm.  Andrew, what are the
> >>>> plans for sending the patches to make the ext2 preallocation work
> >>>> like ext3 to Linus?
> >>>
> >>> Cautious.  I'm not sure that we ever want to merge them, really - ext2 is
> >>> more a reference filesystem than a real one nowadays, and making it more
> >>> complex detracts from that.
> >>
> >> The again while the old preallocation code might be simpler it's also utterly
> >> braindead and we need to make sure no one is going to copy this :)
> >
> > Good point ;)
> 
> Are you refering to that particular implementation in ext2 or to the 
> whole method od doing it implemented currently in ext2?

It's a patch which cross-ports ext3's block-reservation code into ext2.

> When can I read about it (description of the new method/implementation in 
> ext3 and why is it better) some more?

Hard.  google(ext3 reservations) is a starting point.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-19  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-18 10:25 NTFS Anton Altaparmakov
2007-01-18 22:22 ` NTFS Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <20070118143506.4d007aad.akpm@osdl.org>
2007-01-18 22:38     ` NTFS Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-18 22:54       ` NTFS Andrew Morton
2007-01-18 23:27         ` NTFS Grzegorz Kulewski
2007-01-19  0:17           ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-15 20:46 NTFS Dave B. Sharp
2003-05-15 21:11 ` NTFS Szakacsits Szabolcs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070118161741.6ac4e423.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kangur@polcom.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.