All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: neilb@suse.de, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, christopher.leech@intel.com,
	arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] md: move raid5 io requests to raid5_run_ops
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:29:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070123032945.29114.66627.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1169522364.8362.113.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>

From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

handle_stripe now only updates the state of stripes.  All execution of
operations is moved to raid5_run_ops.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---

 drivers/md/raid5.c |   68 ++++++++--------------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 1956b3c..8af084f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2360,6 +2360,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
 						PRINTK("Read_old block %d for r-m-w\n", i);
 						set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
 						set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
+						if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+							sh->ops.count++;
 						locked++;
 					} else {
 						set_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
@@ -2380,6 +2382,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
 						PRINTK("Read_old block %d for Reconstruct\n", i);
 						set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
 						set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
+						if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+							sh->ops.count++;
 						locked++;
 					} else {
 						set_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state);
@@ -2479,6 +2483,8 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
 
 			set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
 			set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &dev->flags);
+			if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+				sh->ops.count++;
 			clear_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state);
 			locked++;
 			set_bit(STRIPE_INSYNC, &sh->state);
@@ -2500,12 +2506,16 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
 		dev = &sh->dev[failed_num];
 		if (!test_bit(R5_ReWrite, &dev->flags)) {
 			set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &dev->flags);
+			if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+				sh->ops.count++;
 			set_bit(R5_ReWrite, &dev->flags);
 			set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
 			locked++;
 		} else {
 			/* let's read it back */
 			set_bit(R5_Wantread, &dev->flags);
+			if (!test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OP_IO, &sh->ops.pending))
+				sh->ops.count++;
 			set_bit(R5_LOCKED, &dev->flags);
 			locked++;
 		}
@@ -2615,64 +2625,6 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe_head *sh)
 			      test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bi->bi_flags)
 			        ? 0 : -EIO);
 	}
-	for (i=disks; i-- ;) {
-		int rw;
-		struct bio *bi;
-		mdk_rdev_t *rdev;
-		if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &sh->dev[i].flags))
-			rw = WRITE;
-		else if (test_and_clear_bit(R5_Wantread, &sh->dev[i].flags))
-			rw = READ;
-		else
-			continue;
- 
-		bi = &sh->dev[i].req;
- 
-		bi->bi_rw = rw;
-		if (rw == WRITE)
-			bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_write_request;
-		else
-			bi->bi_end_io = raid5_end_read_request;
- 
-		rcu_read_lock();
-		rdev = rcu_dereference(conf->disks[i].rdev);
-		if (rdev && test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
-			rdev = NULL;
-		if (rdev)
-			atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
-		rcu_read_unlock();
- 
-		if (rdev) {
-			if (syncing || expanding || expanded)
-				md_sync_acct(rdev->bdev, STRIPE_SECTORS);
-
-			bi->bi_bdev = rdev->bdev;
-			PRINTK("for %llu schedule op %ld on disc %d\n",
-				(unsigned long long)sh->sector, bi->bi_rw, i);
-			atomic_inc(&sh->count);
-			bi->bi_sector = sh->sector + rdev->data_offset;
-			bi->bi_flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
-			bi->bi_vcnt = 1;	
-			bi->bi_max_vecs = 1;
-			bi->bi_idx = 0;
-			bi->bi_io_vec = &sh->dev[i].vec;
-			bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_len = STRIPE_SIZE;
-			bi->bi_io_vec[0].bv_offset = 0;
-			bi->bi_size = STRIPE_SIZE;
-			bi->bi_next = NULL;
-			if (rw == WRITE &&
-			    test_bit(R5_ReWrite, &sh->dev[i].flags))
-				atomic_add(STRIPE_SECTORS, &rdev->corrected_errors);
-			generic_make_request(bi);
-		} else {
-			if (rw == WRITE)
-				set_bit(STRIPE_DEGRADED, &sh->state);
-			PRINTK("skip op %ld on disc %d for sector %llu\n",
-				bi->bi_rw, i, (unsigned long long)sh->sector);
-			clear_bit(R5_LOCKED, &sh->dev[i].flags);
-			set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
-		}
-	}
 }
 
 static void handle_stripe6(struct stripe_head *sh, struct page *tmp_page)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-23  3:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1169522364.8362.113.camel@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
2007-01-23  3:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] dmaengine: add base support for the async_tx api Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 02/12] dmaengine: add " Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 03/12] md: add raid5_run_ops and support routines Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 04/12] md: use raid5_run_ops for stripe cache operations Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 05/12] md: move write operations to raid5_run_ops Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 06/12] md: move raid5 compute block " Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 07/12] md: move raid5 parity checks " Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 08/12] md: satisfy raid5 read requests via raid5_run_ops Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 09/12] md: use async_tx and raid5_run_ops for raid5 expansion operations Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 11/12] md: remove raid5 compute_block and compute_parity5 Dan Williams
2007-01-23  3:29 ` [PATCH 12/12] dmaengine: driver for the iop32x, iop33x, and iop13xx raid engines Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070123032945.29114.66627.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.