From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: dean@arctic.org (dean gaudet), netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why would EPIPE cause socket port to change?
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:26:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070123122652.484c05b3@freekitty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1H9ES2-0006uJ-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:44:10 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> dean gaudet <dean@arctic.org> wrote:
> > in the test program below the getsockname result on a TCP socket changes
> > across a write which produces EPIPE... here's a fragment of the strace:
> >
> > getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(37636), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, [17863593746633850896]) = 0
> > ...
> > write(3, "hi!\n", 4) = 4
> > write(3, "hi!\n", 4) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
> > --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
> > getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(59882), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, [16927060683038654480]) = 0
> >
> > why does the port# change? this is on 2.6.19.1.
>
> Prior to the last write, the socket entered the CLOSED state meaning
> that the old port is no longer allocated to it. As a result, the
> last write operates on an unconnected socket which causes a new local
> port to be allocated as an autobind. It then fails because the socket
> is still not connected.
Why does write cause an autobind? One would think that on a
SOCK_STREAM socket, the write should just fail with ENOTCONN
>
> So any attempt to run getsockname after an error on the socket is
> simply buggy.
>
> Cheers,
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-23 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-23 4:01 why would EPIPE cause socket port to change? dean gaudet
2007-01-23 5:44 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-23 11:10 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-23 11:12 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-23 11:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-01-23 11:18 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-23 18:22 ` Rick Jones
2007-01-23 20:11 ` dean gaudet
2007-01-24 5:11 ` David Miller
2007-01-24 6:09 ` dean gaudet
2007-01-23 20:26 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2007-01-24 5:58 ` Herbert Xu
2007-01-24 6:30 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070123122652.484c05b3@freekitty \
--to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dean@arctic.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.