From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ltt-dev@shafik.org,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
Douglas Niehaus <niehaus@eecs.ku.edu>,
systemtap@sources.redhat.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Richard J Moore <richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] lockdep reentrancy
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 20:29:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070123202909.6b7dcd17.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070116175631.GB16084@Krystal>
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:56:31 -0500
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> wrote:
> Here is a patch to lockdep.c so it behaves correctly when a kprobe breakpoint is
> put on a marker within hardirq tracing functions as long as the marker is within
> the lockdep_recursion incremented boundaries. It should apply on
> 2.6.20-rc4-git3.
>
> Mathieu
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
>
>
> @@ -1841,33 +1843,36 @@ void trace_hardirqs_on(void)
You lost the patch headers.
> struct task_struct *curr = current;
> unsigned long ip;
>
> if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion))
> return;
>
> + current->lockdep_recursion++;
> + barrier();
Why can't we use lockdep_off() here?
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(unlikely(!early_boot_irqs_enabled)))
> - return;
> + goto end;
>
> if (unlikely(curr->hardirqs_enabled)) {
> debug_atomic_inc(&redundant_hardirqs_on);
> - return;
> + goto end;
> }
> /* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
> curr->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
> ip = (unsigned long) __builtin_return_address(0);
>
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> - return;
> + goto end;
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_context))
> - return;
> + goto end;
> /*
> * We are going to turn hardirqs on, so set the
> * usage bit for all held locks:
> */
> if (!mark_held_locks(curr, 1, ip))
> - return;
> + goto end;
> /*
> * If we have softirqs enabled, then set the usage
> * bit for all held locks. (disabled hardirqs prevented
> @@ -1875,11 +1880,14 @@ void trace_hardirqs_on(void)
> */
> if (curr->softirqs_enabled)
> if (!mark_held_locks(curr, 0, ip))
> - return;
> + goto end;
>
> curr->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
> curr->hardirq_enable_event = ++curr->irq_events;
> debug_atomic_inc(&hardirqs_on_events);
> +end:
> + barrier();
> + current->lockdep_recursion--;
lockdep_on()?
> }
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(trace_hardirqs_on);
> @@ -1888,14 +1896,17 @@ void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *curr = current;
>
> if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion))
> return;
>
> + current->lockdep_recursion++;
> + barrier();
lockdep_off()?
> if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
> - return;
> + goto end;
>
> if (curr->hardirqs_enabled) {
> /*
> @@ -1910,6 +1921,9 @@ void trace_hardirqs_off(void)
> debug_atomic_inc(&hardirqs_off_events);
> } else
> debug_atomic_inc(&redundant_hardirqs_off);
> +end:
> + barrier();
> + current->lockdep_recursion--;
lockdep_on()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-24 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 23:52 [PATCH 0/4] Linux Kernel Markers Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-12-20 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers : Architecture agnostic code Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-12-20 23:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] Linux Kernel Markers : kconfig menus Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-12-21 0:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] Linux Kernel Markers : i386 optimisation Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-12-21 0:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] Linux Kernel Markers : powerpc optimisation Mathieu Desnoyers
2006-12-21 0:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-13 1:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] Linux Kernel Markers Richard J Moore
2007-01-13 5:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 0/4 update] Linux Kernel Markers - i386 : pIII erratum 49 : XMC Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-16 18:35 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-01-16 21:27 ` [PATCH 0/4 update] kprobes and traps Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-17 12:25 ` S. P. Prasanna
2007-01-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] lockdep missing barrier() Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-24 4:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-24 16:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-24 17:24 ` [PATCH] order of lockdep off/on in vprintk() should be changed Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-24 17:55 ` [PATCH] minimize lockdep_on/off side-effect Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] lockdep reentrancy Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-01-24 4:29 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-24 16:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070123202909.6b7dcd17.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ltt-dev@shafik.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=niehaus@eecs.ku.edu \
--cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.