From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make libelf build on Solaris
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 19:24:29 +0000
Message-ID: <20070128192429.GA11671@barman.uk.sun.com>
References: <132cc7bc2a356aa058b8.1170005910@xenbld>
	<C1E29908.7F23%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C1E29908.7F23%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:16:40PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:

> > Make libelf build on Solaris.
> > 
> > libelf has a number of Linuxisms. Fix them up.
> 
> Does Solaris define __BYTE_ORDER, __LITTLE_ENDIAN, __BIG_ENDIAN in its
> byteorder.h?

No. It defines _LITTLE_ENDIAN and _BIG_ENDIAN as appropriate. There's no
.*BYTE_ORDER.

regards,
john