From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Atmel DataFlash hooks.
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:43:29 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701291143.16592.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070126212542.72494353CC1@atlas.denx.de>
Hi Wolfgang,
On Friday 26 January 2007 22:25, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > My vote is to treat DataFlash like a block device, and make sure that
> > it supports byte-wide access.
>
> Treat DataFlash like a block device? That sounds wrong to me.
When we treat NAND like a "block device", then we should treat DataFlash like
it too.
> I understand your concerns about the #ifdef mess, but this suggestion
> does not sound tempting either.
Yes, it will break existing board, that have some predefined environment
variables to read/write/... the DataFlash. And the users of DataFlash would
have to adapt to the new syntax.
Best regards,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-29 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-26 16:45 [U-Boot-Users] Atmel DataFlash hooks Peter.Pearse
2007-01-26 19:11 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-26 21:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-26 22:34 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-27 0:42 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-27 1:52 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-27 4:11 ` [U-Boot-Users] Arm-linux-gcc malloc get failure while arm-elf-gcc ok Rui.Zhou at nokia.com
2007-01-27 11:46 ` Rui.Zhou at nokia.com
2007-01-27 13:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] Atmel DataFlash hooks Andreas Schweigstill
2007-01-27 16:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-27 17:04 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2007-01-27 17:17 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-28 14:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 1:32 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2007-01-29 12:52 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-27 22:19 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-28 1:47 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-28 15:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-28 22:21 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-28 22:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 2:50 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-29 13:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 21:06 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-01-29 22:57 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-29 23:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-30 0:28 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-01-30 1:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-30 1:16 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-01-30 22:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-30 6:52 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-31 7:44 ` Tolunay Orkun
2007-01-29 3:17 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-29 7:35 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-29 13:36 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 13:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 20:45 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-29 21:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 23:03 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-30 0:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 23:08 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-30 0:48 ` J. William Campbell
2007-01-30 1:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-30 6:55 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-31 17:11 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-31 17:37 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-31 21:55 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-31 23:13 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-31 23:50 ` Grant Likely
2007-02-01 0:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-02-01 2:46 ` Tolunay Orkun
2007-01-29 11:10 ` Stefan Roese
2007-01-29 2:27 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-28 15:01 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 2:33 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-29 7:49 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-29 13:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <528646bc0701310848x4c63cf53gd228f860c0fd0444@mail.gmail.com>
2007-01-31 16:50 ` Grant Likely
2007-02-01 12:40 ` Andreas Schweigstill
2007-01-29 12:56 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 10:43 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-26 8:44 Grant Likely
2007-01-26 9:42 ` Peter.Pearse
2007-01-26 13:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-26 19:24 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-26 21:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-26 22:35 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <000001c7416f$fa61fed0$01c4af0a@atmel.com>
2007-01-26 19:02 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <02eb01c74180$c4911410$01c4af0a@atmel.com>
2007-01-26 20:27 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-26 21:21 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-26 22:40 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-26 23:01 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-26 23:46 ` Grant Likely
2007-01-27 9:44 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2007-01-29 10:49 ` Stefan Roese
2007-01-29 13:44 ` Peter.Pearse
2007-01-29 14:47 ` Stefan Roese
2007-01-29 16:03 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-01-29 10:33 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701291143.16592.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.