From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Christoph Egger" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use string bound functions (take #2) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:23:27 +0100 Message-ID: <200701300923.27959.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Monday 29 January 2007 17:07, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 29/1/07 14:22, "Christoph Egger" wrote: > > I killed safe_strcpy() and almost all users from strcpy() and strncpy(). > > The remaining users are acm and acpi. > > When this is done, strcpy() and strncpy() can be removed. > > Okay, there are no live users of strcpy/strncpy/strcat/strncat (I fixed the > acm uses and the acpi uses are dead macros that aren't used). So I've > killed off those functions, #defined them to informative undefined labels, > and implemented strlcat(). > > sprintf() can go once the ia64 uses are fixed up. Great! When do these changes appear in the public tree? Christoph