From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi,
	documentation and libxen
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:12:10 +0000
Message-ID: <20070130151210.GC3261@leeni.uk.xensource.com>
References: <1170167387.3996.2.camel@woodcrest1.watson.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1170167387.3996.2.camel@woodcrest1.watson.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:

> This patch aligns vTPM support in the Xen-API, documentation and lib-xen
> (after the recent changes).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>

What's the intention here?  You've removed the get_instance calls, but not the
instance field from the documentation.  Assuming that that's just a mistake,
and you meant to remove the instance field, we're left with a VTPM class that
has nothing other than a reference to a VM and a reference to a backend
domain.  What are the semantics of that object now?

Ewan.