From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MinGW port usable
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:28:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070130162835.GD25950@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701301708160.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I wonder what the difference is between NO_MMAP=Yes and NO_MMAP=
> > on Windows.
> Cygwin:
> real 0m0.812s
> and
> real 0m2.094s
>
> IOW, the numbers are slightly worse (!) than with mmap().
Slightly? That's double the time!
> MinGW does not even have mmap().
But Windows has something almost there. I just read a flame war
thread about implementing mmap in libiberty for MinGW by stealing
source from Cygwin, and how the FSF might feel about someone's
dirty feet after playing rugby. Yea... Google is good. :)
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-29 22:20 MinGW port usable Johannes Sixt
2007-01-29 22:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-29 23:11 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-29 23:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-29 23:48 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 7:59 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 8:07 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 10:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:27 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 16:31 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 8:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-29 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-29 23:08 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 10:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 10:14 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 8:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 14:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:18 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 15:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:56 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 16:28 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2007-01-30 16:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 0:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 8:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 8:41 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-01-30 10:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 17:09 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 17:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 18:09 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 20:20 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-01 6:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 10:34 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-01 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 8:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 8:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-02 8:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-02 8:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070130162835.GD25950@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.sixt@telecom.at \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.