From: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
To: Joe Harvell <jharvell+lists.linux-kernel@dogpad.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: ACPI C and P states on Conroe
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701302017.47599.lenb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45BF81CF.2060801@dogpad.net>
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 12:35, Joe Harvell wrote:
> I am trying to enable all the power saving features I can on my Conroe
> E6600. After much searching on the web, I am a little confused about
> the Linux kernel support for ACPI on the Conroe.
>
> Here is my setup:
> Intel Core2 Duo E6600
> Asus P5-B Deluxe board (Intel P965).
> I am running a Gentoo kernel based on 2.6.19.4.
>
> I have managed to enable EIST using cpufreq with the speedstep-centrino
> driver. But my understanding from browsing the ACPI spec is that this
> is still within C0, i.e. not much power savings.
Right, P-states are effective only when code is executing,
and on this processor (with C1E) will have no effect on idle power.
> Here are my questions:
>
> 1) For P states, which cpufreq driver should I be using? I've heard
> speedstep-centrino is deprecated (but only some aspects of it) that are
> being moved into acpi-cpufreq. But I can't get acpi-cpufreq to load in
> my kernel version.
In 2.6.19 I believe that speedstep-centrino is the one to use.
The transition to acpi-cpufreq happens in 2.6.20.
> Also, I would have thought speedstep-ich would be
> the driver, just based on the name.
Don't use speedstep-ich.
> How do I know (other than trying
> all modules to see which one loads) which one I should be using?
> 2) What kind of support for C1-C3 does the Conroe have? The ACPI spec
> says C2 and C3 require chipset support on the motherboard. Does P965
> have that. Does it matter between boards (e.g. P5B)?
I believe that Conroe currently supports just C1 --
this is true for the ones I have.
Internally it is an "Enhanced C1" called C1E where the voltage is reduced
in C1-- but this is transparent to software, which thinks it is just C1.
You can observe this in
/proc/acpi/processor/*/power
> 3) What versions of the kernel support C1-C3 states? What kernel
> options are germane to this? What libraries/tools are involved?
C1-C3 have been supported for a long time.
2.6.20 adds a few tweaks to use a more efficient implementation,
but you'll not notice a difference on today's desktop processor.
cheers,
-Len
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-30 17:35 ACPI C and P states on Conroe Joe Harvell
2007-01-31 1:17 ` Len Brown [this message]
[not found] <fa.kcyyw0/u0jusCdUVaHf0ecFyj0E@ifi.uio.no>
2007-01-30 23:09 ` Robert Hancock
2007-01-31 0:18 ` Joe Harvell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-30 17:33 Joe Harvell
2007-01-30 22:31 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701302017.47599.lenb@kernel.org \
--to=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=jharvell+lists.linux-kernel@dogpad.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.