All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 7909] New: malfunction of udp_get_port() in wildcard ports assigning
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:39:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070131103958.1739bb80@freekitty> (raw)



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:50:39 -0800
From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: [Bug 7909] New: malfunction of udp_get_port() in wildcard ports assigning


http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909

           Summary: malfunction of udp_get_port() in wildcard ports
                    assigning
    Kernel Version: 2.6.19
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
             Owner: shemminger@osdl.org
         Submitter: Konstantin.Petrov@oktetlabs.ru
                CC: Alexandra.Kossovsky@oktetlabs.ru


Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.6.18.4
Distribution: Debian
Hardware Environment: PCs x86-64 and i686
Software Environment: 
Problem Description:

repeated binding of datagram sockets to some IP with wildcard
port fails after ~three hundred iterations with errno EADDRINUSE.
List of really assigned ports looks strangely:
...PORT[128-port-numbers-gap]PORT[128-port-numbers-gap]...

Steps to reproduce:

See code:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/errno.h>

int
main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    int                                 iut_s;
    int                                 retval;
    struct sockaddr_in                  servaddr,
                                        cliaddr;
    socklen_t                           namelen;
    char                                addr_buf[16];
    int                                 i;

    /* Read command line arguments */
    if (argc != 2)
    {
        printf("\nuse pco_iut <local IP>\n");
        return -1;
    }

    memset(&servaddr, 0, sizeof(servaddr));
    servaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
    inet_pton(AF_INET, argv[1], &servaddr.sin_addr);
    servaddr.sin_port = 0;

    for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
    {
        if ( (iut_s = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, 0)) < 0)
        {
            printf("\nFailed to create socket No %d error %d\n", i + 1,
                    errno);
            return -1;
        }

        if (bind(iut_s,(struct sockaddr *) &servaddr, sizeof(servaddr)) != 0)
        {
            printf("\nFailed to bind socket No %d error %d\n", i + 1,
                    errno);
            return -1;
        }

        namelen = sizeof(cliaddr);
        if (getsockname(iut_s, (struct sockaddr *)&cliaddr, &namelen) != 0)
        {
            printf("\ngetsockname() error errno %d\n", errno);
            return -1;
        }
        else
        {
            inet_ntop(AF_INET, &cliaddr.sin_addr,
                        addr_buf, 16);
            printf("\nBound to %s:%d\n",
                    addr_buf,
                    ntohs(cliaddr.sin_port));
        }
    }

    return 0;
}


The reason of this issue is IMHO in udp_get_port() function
which was added in 2.6.19 version to replace udp_v4_get_port()
in older versions.
 
In ugp_get_port() we see the strange piece of code

.................................................................
                        size = 0;
                        sk_for_each(sk2, node, head)
                                if (++size < best_size_so_far) {
                                        best_size_so_far = size;
                                        best = result;
                                }
                }
                result = best;
                for(i = 0; i < (1 << 16) / UDP_HTABLE_SIZE; i++, result +=
UDP_HTABLE_SIZE) {
..........................................................................

which means that sk_for_each(...) iteration is repeated only once.

No such problem in older kernels where the similar
piece of code in udp_v4_get_port() looks like

..........................................................................
                        size = 0;
                        sk_for_each(sk2, node, list)
                                if (++size >= best_size_so_far)
                                        goto next;
                        best_size_so_far = size;
                        best = result;
                next:;
                }
                result = best;
                for(i = 0; i < (1 << 16) / UDP_HTABLE_SIZE; i++, result +=
UDP_HTABLE_SIZE) {

..........................................................................

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>

                 reply	other threads:[~2007-01-31 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070131103958.1739bb80@freekitty \
    --to=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.