From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Bedogni Subject: Re: Routing packets via a C program Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:12:55 +0100 Message-ID: <200702011812.55498.bedogniluca-linux@yahoo.it> References: <200701220958.51794.bedogniluca-linux@yahoo.it> <200701301714.10868.bedogniluca-linux@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701301714.10868.bedogniluca-linux@yahoo.it> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Tuesday 30 January 2007 17:14, Luca Bedogni wrote: > On Saturday 27 January 2007 15:55, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Jan 22 2007 09:58, Luca Bedogni wrote: > > >Hi all > > > i'm writing down a simple program for routing the packets manually. The > > >idea is: if a packet comes from a specific IP (192.168.0.2) I set > > > ip->saddr to my ip and then accept it. And, if a packets comes from the > > > outside, i set ip->daddr to 192.168.0.2 and then accept it. I > > > recalculate the checksum and it's correct (i can see that by printing > > > out it). > > > > What for - are you trying some nifty SNAT/DNAT trick? > > Yes, i want to monitor performances and such via normal routing and via > userspace routing. > > > >The basic problem is that, sniffing packets with wireshark, i can see > > > the packet from 192.168.0.2 to outside, but not mine to outside. > > > > > >I also tried with NF_REPEAT and NF_ACCEPT and NF_QUEUE when calling > > >ipq_set_verdict, but nothing changed.. > > > > You should be fine by QUEUEing packets in PREROUTING (or at least > > somewhere before the in [PacketFlow]), modify them in > > your userspace program, reinject them, and have the do > > the right then. > > Yes i basically do this, but the packets aren't reinjected. I change the IP > and recalculate the checksum, but when calling ipq_set_verdict I can't see > any packets on the wire :( ATM i've wrote this piece of code that would be sufficient: /* * This code is GPL. */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #define BUFSIZE 8194 int main (int argc, char **argv) { int status; int n_interfaces; unsigned char buf[BUFSIZE]; struct ipq_handle *h; h = malloc(sizeof(struct ipq_handle)); /* Creating an handle */ h = ipq_create_handle (0, PF_INET); if (!h) iptables_die (h); /* Copying all the packet and not only metadata */ status = ipq_set_mode (h, IPQ_COPY_PACKET, BUFSIZE); if (status < 0) iptables_die (h); do { if ((status = ipq_read (h, buf, BUFSIZE, 0)) < 0) iptables_die (h); switch (ipq_message_type (buf)) { case NLMSG_ERROR: fprintf (stderr, "Received error message %d\n",ipq_get_msgerr (buf)); break; case IPQM_PACKET: fprintf(stderr,""); ipq_packet_msg_t *m = ipq_get_packet (buf); struct iphdr *ip = (struct iphdr *) m->payload; if (ip->saddr == inet_addr("192.168.0.2")) { ip->saddr = inet_addr("192.168.1.5"); } else { ip->daddr = inet_addr("192.168.0.2"); } ip->check = ip_checksum(ip); status = ipq_set_verdict (h, m->packet_id, NF_ACCEPT, 0, NULL); if (status < 0) iptables_die (h); break; default: fprintf (stderr, "Unknown message type!\n"); break; } } while (1); ipq_destroy_handle (h); return 0; } This is a very ugly "routing", i now, but would be enough for me. I can see the packets entering on my machine but nothing can exit my pc. I think the code is ok, but maybe's wrong -_- Regards -- Debian Powered GNU/Linux User #373118 Bedogni Luca - Blog | http://blog.lucabedogni.it Site | http://www.lucabedogni.it Debianizzati - www.debianizzati.org | Founder Member -- Programming is like sex: One mistake and you have to support it your lifetime.