From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] add --remote option to git-clone. Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:31:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20070201233109.GA19446@spearce.org> References: <20070201220122.GF17617@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 02 00:31:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HClOg-0001fT-NQ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:31:19 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422893AbXBAXbQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:31:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422894AbXBAXbQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:31:16 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:51887 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422893AbXBAXbP (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:31:15 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HClOQ-0002Oy-CF; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:31:02 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC5E020FBAE; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:31:09 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > would this option not be better named "--branch"? Of course, you'd have to > support this, too: > > $ git clone --branch topic1 --branch topic2 git://... Yes, --branch sounds better here. -- Shawn.