From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Frédéric Riss" <frederic.riss@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:58:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702031058.13830.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170496175.31373.31.camel@funkylaptop>
On Saturday 03 February 2007 10:49, Frédéric Riss wrote:
> Was what I did in the initial patch:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/30/258
>
> The issue is that the structure definition is used on multiple
> architectures (for now ia64 and i386) which might used different calling
> conventions. As Bjorn Helgaas pointed out, ia64 already has such wrapper
> functions. I agree that the casting isn't the nicest thing, but I prefer
> that to writing asm stubs.
Define a efilinkage macro then that expands to nothing on ia64
Probably asmlinkage would work already, syscall_linkage as used on ia64 doesn't
seem to affect function pointers.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-03 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-31 4:28 Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <45C05150.6000802@agmk.net>
2007-01-31 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-31 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200702010037.48472.pluto@agmk.net>
2007-02-01 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-01 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-01 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-01-31 17:11 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix preprocessor condition Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2007-01-31 17:16 ` Andi Kleen
2007-01-31 17:40 ` Josef Sipek
2007-01-31 18:15 ` Linux 2.6.20-rc7 Sunil Naidu
2007-02-01 2:16 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 3:01 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 3:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 5:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-01 6:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 6:38 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2007-02-01 6:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 20:52 ` S.Çağlar Onur
2007-02-01 21:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 5:49 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2007-02-02 5:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-02 5:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 1:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 2:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-03 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:19 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 9:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 9:49 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 9:58 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-02-03 10:47 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-03 10:57 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-03 11:08 ` Frédéric RISS
2007-02-04 13:13 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-04 17:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-04 18:18 ` Frédéric Riss
2007-02-04 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-05 8:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-05 9:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:44 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 1) Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 0:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-02-03 6:06 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 7:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 18:06 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 20:43 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 21:00 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-03 21:26 ` Auke Kok
2007-02-03 22:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 21:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 23:20 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-04 1:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-04 4:44 ` Adam Kropelin
2007-02-04 5:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-02-03 0:47 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions (v2) (part 2) Adrian Bunk
[not found] <19868466.241170405430418.JavaMail.root@lxnaydesign.net>
2007-02-02 8:45 ` 2.6.20-rc7: known regressions Fabio Erculiani
2007-02-02 13:58 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702031058.13830.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic.riss@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.