From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FF0DDE45 for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 09:30:28 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:37:54 -0600 To: Geoff Levand Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/9] pasemi: Default root device Message-ID: <20070204223754.GC2862@lixom.net> References: <20070202045448.145851000@lixom.net>> <20070202045507.589087000@lixom.net>> <45C3BB0A.1020307@am.sony.com> <20070204221849.GA2862@lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20070204221849.GA2862@lixom.net> From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:18:49PM -0600, olof wrote: > What's no longer desired, the logic trying to figure out if NFS is the > root, or setting a platform-specific root device if none is specified > already? After discussion on IRC; chances of actually making the right decision for a user is fairly slim anyway, we should always rely on them (or the bootloader) specifying the right thing on the command line instead. I'll just drop it when I repost the series. -Olof