From: Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Re: error, types differ in signedness
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 12:06:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070205200617.GA14964@chrisli.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070205105420.6f19a57d.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 10:54:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> The skbuff.[hc] difference is in *getfrag vs. getfrag.
> The mpage.[hc] difference is in *get_block vs. getblock.
>
> Questions:
> 1. Is the warning valid?
I don't think so.
> 2. Isn't the '*' unnecessary?
It is valid in C without '*'. Sparse already know the function
is going to degenerated into function pointers. It wrongly inherent
the signedness. You get a signed pointer.
Can you please try this patch?
Chris
Index: sparse/symbol.h
===================================================================
--- sparse.orig/symbol.h 2007-02-04 23:46:07.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse/symbol.h 2007-02-05 12:18:30.000000000 -0800
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ struct symbol {
#define MOD_SIZE (MOD_CHAR | MOD_SHORT | MOD_LONG | MOD_LONGLONG)
#define MOD_IGNORE (MOD_TOPLEVEL | MOD_STORAGE | MOD_ADDRESSABLE | \
MOD_ASSIGNED | MOD_USERTYPE | MOD_FORCE | MOD_ACCESSED | MOD_EXPLICITLY_SIGNED)
+#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE)
/* Current parsing/evaluation function */
Index: sparse/evaluate.c
===================================================================
--- sparse.orig/evaluate.c 2007-02-04 00:47:46.000000000 -0800
+++ sparse/evaluate.c 2007-02-05 12:20:08.000000000 -0800
@@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static void examine_fn_arguments(struct
else
ptr->ctype.base_type = arg;
ptr->ctype.as |= s->ctype.as;
- ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers;
+ ptr->ctype.modifiers |= s->ctype.modifiers & MOD_PTRINHERIT;
s->ctype.base_type = ptr;
s->ctype.as = 0;
@@ -1313,8 +1313,6 @@ static struct symbol *convert_to_as_mod(
return sym;
}
-#define MOD_PTRINHERIT (MOD_VOLATILE | MOD_CONST | MOD_NODEREF | MOD_STORAGE)
-
static struct symbol *create_pointer(struct expression *expr, struct symbol *sym, int degenerate)
{
struct symbol *node = alloc_symbol(expr->pos, SYM_NODE);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-05 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-05 18:54 error, types differ in signedness Randy Dunlap
2007-02-05 20:06 ` Christopher Li [this message]
2007-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH] " Randy Dunlap
2007-02-05 22:27 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-02-06 0:16 ` Christopher Li
2007-02-06 1:12 ` Pavel Roskin
2007-02-06 18:36 ` Christopher Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070205200617.GA14964@chrisli.org \
--to=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.