From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: make cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() work on idle dwork
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:43:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070207174355.GA340@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070207151630.GA138@tv-sign.ru>
On 02/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> The following code
>
> schedule_delayed_work(dw);
> cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(dw); // OK
> cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(dw); // HANGS!
>
> still doesn't work.
I think we have another problem with delayed_works.
cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() doesn't garantee that the ->func() is not
running upon return. I don't know if it is bug or not, the comment says nothing
about that.
However, we have the callers which seem to assume the opposite, example
net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c
module_exit
ip_vs_cleanup
ip_vs_control_cleanup
cancel_rearming_delayed_work
// done
This is unsafe. The module may be unloaded and the memory may be freed
while defense_work_handler() is still running/preempted.
Unless I missed something, which side should be fixed?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 23:30 [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: make cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() work on idle dwork Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-07 14:33 ` Daniel Drake
2007-02-07 15:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-07 17:43 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-02-08 2:20 ` Horms
2007-02-08 8:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-08 8:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-08 9:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070207174355.GA340@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.