From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7962] New: oops in port_carrier_check Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 09:52:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20070209095204.7f43a964@oldman> References: <20070207140916.088b1073@oldman> <20070209074211.GA1631@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "bugme-daemon\@kernel-bugs\.osdl\.org" , pterjan@gmail.com To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:33695 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992464AbXBIRwR (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:52:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070209074211.GA1631@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:42:11 +0100 Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On 07-02-2007 23:09, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:52:16 -0800 > > Andrew Morton wrote: > ... > >> Feb 7 21:20:18 plop kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at > >> virtual address 6b6b6b6b > >> Feb 7 21:20:18 plop kernel: printing eip: > >> Feb 7 21:20:18 plop kernel: *pde = 00000000 > >> Feb 7 21:20:18 plop kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1] > >> Feb 7 21:20:18 plop kernel: CPU: 0 > >> Feb 7 21:20:19 plop kernel: EIP: 0060:[pg0+814360305/1067136000] Not > >> tainted VLI > >> Feb 7 21:20:19 plop kernel: EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted VLI > >> Feb 7 21:20:19 plop kernel: EFLAGS: 00010202 (2.6.20.0.rc7-1mdv #1) > >> Feb 7 21:20:19 plop kernel: EIP is at port_carrier_check+0x22/0x75 [bridge] > >> Feb 7 21:20:19 plop kernel: eax: 6b6b6b6b ebx: 6b6b6b6b ecx: 00000000 > > I think it's caused by pending delayed workqueue > trying to use dev after kfree (POISON_FREE in eax, ebx). > > > static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work) > > { > > struct net_bridge_port *p; > > struct net_device *dev; > > struct net_bridge *br; > > > > dev = container_of(work, struct net_bridge_port, > > carrier_check.work)->dev; > > work_release(work); > > > > rtnl_lock(); > > p = dev->br_port; > > if (!p) > > goto done; > > br = p->br; > > > > if (netif_carrier_ok(dev)) > > p->path_cost = port_cost(dev); > > > > if (br->dev->flags & IFF_UP) { > > My investigation seems to point at this line (p == ebx > but not NULL because of mem debugging on, probably). > The carrier_check is canceled by removal of port from bridge. Perhaps there is something broken in rcu assumptions under Qemu