From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeJe-0007Bh-VW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:34:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeJd-0007BR-MJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:34:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFeJd-0007BO-GN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:34:01 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HFeJd-0003iD-1I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:34:01 -0500 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Two quick requests. Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:33:58 -0500 References: <200702091719.16429.rob@landley.net> <200702092227.09299.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200702092227.09299.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702091733.59151.rob@landley.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Friday 09 February 2007 5:27 pm, Paul Brook wrote: > On Friday 09 February 2007 22:19, Rob Landley wrote: > > 1) When you accidentally run qemu as root, could it NOT try to go into a > > full-screen display by default resulting in a corrupted display you can't > > break out of and have to power cycle the machine? > > This is a feature of your SDL libraries. They're probably trying to use > console framebuffer output. Complain to whoever supplied your SDL libraries. Ubuntu. And yeah, probably. > > 2) After said reboot, when you're sanely running qemu as a normal user but > > using the hda image file you made as root, if a hard drive image isn't > > writeable, could it warn or something, rather than having the ubuntu > > install mysteriously fail halfway through when it finds itself unable to > > mount /dev/hda1 after it thinks it just partitioned the drive? > > I think this is also a feature. Previous versions would refuse to use readonly > images at all. Could it warn? (I admit it'll probably get buried in the "ubuntu doesn't default to 1024 hz and you're not root" warning, but I spent a day trying to figure this one out. Slow reboots, and I thought it was another side effect of the KDE timeouts. :) Thanks, Rob -- "Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery