From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Tomasz Chilinski" <chilek@chilan.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:28:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Is ESFQ working?
Message-Id: <20070211122440.M20772@chilan.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <200702111301.51685.alejandro_aero@yahoo.es>
In-Reply-To: <200702111301.51685.alejandro_aero@yahoo.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:01:45 +0100, Alejandro Lorenzo Gallego wrote
> Hi there, i am trying to shape a network for a college dorms...

Hi Alejandro.

> INTERNET---- ETH0--------Nat Box-------ETH1--------LAN
>=20
> I have set up  classes of traffic (HTTP, FTP, MAIL, IM, OTHER) and i=20
> have assigned a rate for everyone with a HTB qdisc. The limit based=20
> in traffic is working flawlessly.
>=20
> However, under every HTB class i have set up a ESFQ queue discipline=20
> with hash value set to 'dst'  int eth1 to control the rate of=20
> download of every user, but it appears to do nothing.
>=20
> and in eth0 there is a prio handler
>=20
> According to documentation, every user should get a fair amount of=20
> bandwidth but currently, users with some kind of download=20
> accelerator gets a higher amount of bandwidth
>=20
> Is ESFQ working right for someone?
>=20
> =BFShould i go for imq for this kind of shaping?

Can you show a snippet of your script here?

Bests, Tomasz Chilinski.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc