From: Alexander Litvinov <litvinov2004@gmail.com>
To: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@verizon.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:32:51 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702130932.51601.litvinov2004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45CFA30C.6030202@verizon.net>
В сообщении от Monday 12 February 2007 05:13 Mark Levedahl написал(a):
> 1) git is a POSIX only tool (i.e., there will be no \r\n munging), or
> 2) a Windows port of git will handle and mung \r\n and \n line endings.
>
> If the answer is 1, the mingw port is a waste of time as it simply won't
> be usable by its target audience. If the answer is 2, then I think a
> very careful design of this capability is in order.
I am strongly object this statement. I develop one project under Windows and
use Cygwin git for this. Yes, I have a problem with git's thinking line
ending is a \n but most of troubles are diff and rebase. In general git works
well with \r\n line endings.
When I have file that was converted from dos to unix format (or from unix to
dos) git genereta big diff. But anyway, c++ compiler works well with both
formats and in this case I simply convert file to dos format and git shows
again nice diff. If unix format was commited to git I simply change the
format and commit that file again.
The only trouble is the rebase, it does not like \r\n ending and othen produce
unexpected merge conflict. But I don't use rebse to othen to realy
investigate and try to solve the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-13 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-11 23:13 mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git Mark Levedahl
2007-02-11 23:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 0:46 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-02-12 2:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-12 11:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 0:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-12 2:37 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-12 4:24 ` Theodore Tso
2007-02-12 7:28 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 11:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 22:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 23:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 23:23 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 23:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:46 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 23:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 0:59 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 1:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 1:13 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-02-13 1:20 ` David Lang
2007-02-13 1:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 5:18 ` Jeff King
2007-02-13 0:32 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 2:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 3:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 6:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 3:32 ` Alexander Litvinov [this message]
2007-02-13 10:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 12:16 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-13 12:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 19:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 1:42 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 21:58 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 1:18 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 20:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-13 21:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-02-13 23:19 ` David Lang
2007-02-13 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 8:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-14 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 16:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-14 3:47 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-14 5:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 11:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 14:26 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 15:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 16:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:28 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 18:17 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 20:24 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 15:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 11:36 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-14 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 16:16 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-14 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 17:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-02-13 18:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702130932.51601.litvinov2004@gmail.com \
--to=litvinov2004@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevedahl@verizon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.